Proof-of-stake (PoS)

Τελευταία επεξεργασία: , Invalid DateTime

Δείτε τους συνεισφέροντες

Edit page

Ethereum is moving to a consensus mechanism called proof-of-stake (PoS) from proof-of-work (PoW). This was always the plan as it's a key part in the community's strategy to scale Ethereum via the Eth2 upgrades. However getting PoS right is a big technical challenge and not as straightforward as using PoW to reach consensus across the network.

Prerequisites

To better understand this page, we recommend you first read up on consensus mechanisms.

What is proof-of-stake (PoS)?

Proof of stake is a type of consensus mechanism used by blockchain networks to achieve distributed consensus.

It requires users to stake their ETH to become a validator in the network. Validators are responsible for the same thing as miners in proof-of-work: ordering transactions and creating new blocks so that all nodes can agree on the state of the network.

Proof-of-stake comes with a number of improvements to the proof-of-work system:

• better energy efficiency – you don't need to use lots of energy mining blocks
• lower barriers to entry, reduced hardware requirements – you don't need elite hardware to stand a chance of creating new blocks
• stronger immunity to centralization – proof-of-stake should lead to more nodes in the network
• stronger support for shard chains – a key upgrade in scaling the Ethereum network

Proof-of-stake, staking, and validators

Proof-of-stake is the underlying mechanism that activates validators upon receipt of enough stake. For Ethereum, users will need to stake 32 ETH to become a validator. Validators are chosen at random to create blocks and are responsible for checking and confirming blocks they don't create. A user's stake is also used as a way to incentivise good validator behavior. For example, a user can lose a portion of their stake for things like going offline (failing to validate) or their entire stake for deliberate collusion.

How does Ethereum's proof-of-stake work?

Unlike proof-of-work, validators don't need to use significant amounts of computational power because they're selected at random and aren't competing. They don't need to mine blocks; they just need to create blocks when chosen and validate proposed blocks when they're not. This validation is known as attesting. You can think of attesting as saying "this block looks good to me." Validators get rewards for proposing new blocks and for attesting to ones they've seen.

If you attest to malicious blocks, you lose your stake.

The beacon chain

When Ethereum replaces proof-of-work with proof-of-stake, there will be the added complexity of shard chains. These are separate blockchains that will need validators to process transactions and create new blocks. The plan is to have 64 shard chains, with each having a shared understanding of the state of the network. As a result, extra coordination is necessary and will be done by the beacon chain.

The beacon chain receives state information from shards and makes it available for other shards, allowing the network to stay in sync. The beacon chain will also manage the validators from registering their stake deposits to issuing their rewards and penalties.

Here's how that process works.

How validation works

When you submit a transaction on a shard, a validator will be responsible for adding your transaction to a shard block. Validators are algorithmically chosen by the beacon chain to propose new blocks.

Attestation

If a validator isn't chosen to propose a new shard block, they'll have to attest to another validator's proposal and confirm that everything looks as it should. It's the attestation that is recorded in the beacon chain rather than the transaction itself.

At least 128 validators are required to attest to each shard block – this is known as a "committee."

The committee has a time-frame in which to propose and validate a shard block. This is known as a "slot." Only one valid block is created per slot, and there are 32 slots in an "epoch." After each epoch, the committee is disbanded and reformed with different, random participants. This helps keep shards safe from committees of bad actors.

Crosslinks

Once a new shard block proposal has enough attestations, a "crosslink" is created which confirms the inclusion of the block and your transaction in the beacon chain.

Once there's a crosslink, the validator who proposed the block gets their reward.

Finality

In distributed networks, a transaction has "finality" when it's part of a block that can't change.

To do this in proof-of-stake, Casper, a finality protocol, gets validators to agree on the state of a block at certain checkpoints. So long as 2/3 of the validators agree, the block is finalised. Validators will lose their entire stake if they try and revert this later on via a 51% attack.

As Vlad Zamfir put it, this is like a miner participating in a 51% attack, causing their mining hardware to immediately burn down.

Proof-of-stake and security

The threat of a 51% attack still exists in proof-of-stake, but it's even more risky for the attackers. To do so, you'd need to control 51% of the staked ETH. Not only is this a lot of money, but it would probably cause ETH's value to drop. There's very little incentive to destroy the value of a currency you have a majority stake in. There are stronger incentives to keep the network secure and healthy.

Stake slashings, ejections, and other penalties, coordinated by the beacon chain, will exist to prevent other acts of bad behavior. Validators will also be responsible for flagging these incidents.

Pros and cons

Further Reading

• What is Proof of Stake ConsenSys
• The Beacon Chain Ethereum 2.0 explainer you need to read first Ethos.dev

Related Topics

• Proof of work

ΠροηγούμενοΕξόρυξη

ΕπόμενοΕισαγωγή στο stack